Legal Opinion

David F. Freeman v. Ace Telephone Assoc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 1, 2006No. 06-1435PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

David Freeman appeals the entry of summary judgment against him by the district court 1 on the retaliation claim that he brought against his former employer, Ace Telephone Association, under the Minnesota Whistleblower Statute, see Minn.Stat. § 181.932. We affirm.

I

After Mr. Freeman was fired from his position as co-CEO of Ace, he sued his former employer for gender and marital-status discrimination in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), see Minn.Stat. § 363A.08.2, as well as retaliatory discharge in violation of the Minnesota Whistleblower Statute, see…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paul J. Kiel v. Select Artificials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Andre Pope v. Esa Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Sheila E. Peterson v. Scott County Scott County Sheriff's Department William J. Nevin, Sheriff Tom Helmrich, Jail AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Aviation Charter, Inc. v. Aviation Research Group/us Joseph MoeggenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Patel v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Clemmons v. ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. Buytendorp v. Extendicare Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Larry Johnson v. Schulte Hosp. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API