Dye v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment which held that the reasonableness of rezoning a parcel of land was “fairly debatable” and that the rezoning was therefore valid and must be upheld. We agree and affirm the judgment.
In 1961, the City of Phoenix, after conducting hearings concerning the proposed zoning of various areas, comprehensively zoned the entire city. This included 8.7 acres at the southwest corner of 56th Street and Thomas Road in Phoenix, which are the subject of this lawsuit. Various portions of the property were zoned C-2, P-1, R-5 and Rl-6. Such zoning would…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Mueller v. City of Phoenix Ex Rel. Phoenix Board of Adjustment IIArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Phoenix v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- City of Tempe v. RasorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- City of Phoenix v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com'n of Calcasieu ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Bartolomeo v. Town of Paradise ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Corrigan v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Harvey v. Town of MarionCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000