Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Lewis

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1912No. 3408PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Denver District Court. Hon. Harry C. Riddle, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

This is an action brought by appellee to recover from appellant the principal sum of $1,170, together with interest thereon at eight per cent, per annum, the principal stun named being an amount of money paid by plaintiff to defendant to be by him invested for plaintiff in the purchase of certain specified stocks in a mining company, and which was by him so invested.

The complaint contained two causes of action, the first in tort, and the second in contract. By the first it was in substance alleged: That defendant, about November 12th, 1900, represented himself to be the president of The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. St. Louis & Denver Land & Mining Co. v. TierneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
  2. Brewster v. CountrymanNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  3. Kilbride v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Jenckes v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Norris v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alzado v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Caldwell v. ArmstrongColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Kramer v. LinzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Ruth v. FlynnColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Peterson v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API