Legal Opinion
St. Louis & Denver Land & Mining Co. v. Tierney
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 25 opinions
Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
The appellee brought suit in the court below against the appellant upon a contract for the delivery of coal, *583alleging as a breach thereof, that on the 23rd day of January, 1878, while the contract was in force, the appellant without cause or éxcuse discharged him, and refused to allow him to deliver any coal under it. __
The contract is as follows:
“ James F-. Tierney to Boulder Talley Coal Company. I do hereby contract, and hold myself responsible for the safe and prompt delivery of all the Boulder Talley Coal Company’s coal in the city of Denver, and to all parts of said city of Denver, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Black v. WoodrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
3Cited by25 opinions
- Martin v. Star Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1956
- Fearnley v. FearnleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. PryorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- McPhee v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Messenger v. German American InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.