Legal Opinion
Caldwell v. Armstrong
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 21, 1982No. 79CA0637PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERMAN, Judge.
In an action arising from the sale of a house, plaintiffs, Dan W. and Judy A. Caldwell, appeal the judgment of the trial court. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
We are urged to dismiss the appeal because of the Caldwells’ failure to comply strictly with C.A.R. 7. This issue was not preserved for our consideration by proper motion to the trial court, C.A.R. 7, and, in any event, it is without merit.
The Caldwells entered into a contract with Harvey L. and Betty M. Armstrong, sellers, for the purchase of the Armstrongs’ residence which was listed with defendant, Rustic Realty,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Linley v. HansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Newcomb v. SchaefflerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Calvat v. JuhanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Hannah v. James A. Ryder Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Ciancio v. SerafiniColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Frank Felix Associates, Ltd. v. Austin Drugs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Flagstaff Enterprises Construction, Inc. v. SnowColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Anderson v. RosebrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- W. F. Construction Co. v. KalikIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Crum v. April Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.