Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Linz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1934No. 3021PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELPHREY, Chief Justice.

On the 11th day of February, 1911, the following instrument was executed by Edgar L. Pike and appellant:

“State of Texas, County of Dallas.
“Whereas, Albert Linz, has subscribed to 1 share of stock in City Investment Company, a corporation organized for the purpose of buying and selling real estate and kindred purposes at the solicitation of Edgar L. Pike and Irvin L. Kramer,
“Now, Therefore, in consideration of such subscription, the said Pike and Kramer hereby indemnify the said Albert Linz against the loss of the amount so invested <pr any part thereof.”

A certificate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Norris v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Bullock v. LewisColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mitchell's, Inc. v. FriedmanTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kracman v. Ozark Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Moberly v. LeonardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. National Surety Corporation v. Rauscher, Pierce & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Bank of El Paso v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API