Legal Opinion

Seebach v. Kuhn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1908No. Civ. No. 507PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. M. H. Hyland, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This action was brought by a contractor to recover the last two payments, amounting to $1,465, under a building contract, he claiming to have completed the work contracted for, the third payment being payable on completion of the work, and the fourth and last payment thirty-five days thereafter.

The action was tried with a jury, and upon their special and general verdict judgment was entered for plaintiff for the sum of $1,426. This is an appeal by defendant from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The building was to be erected by several independent contractors,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Savage v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Estate of WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Richter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Bryan Elevator Co. v. LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API