Legal Opinion

Gianelli v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1920No. Civ. No. 2167PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. J. ■ A. Plummer, Judge presiding. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of $1,590 defendant prosecutes this appeal.

Plaintiffs were the owners of a tract of land, situated near Stockton, upon which, in the season of 1918, they had grown and harvested a crop of hay amounting to 330 tons. The hay was baled and was in one stack on the premises, each bale, with the exception of eighty tons, being tagged with the weight. On August 8, 1918, J. E. Morgan, of Stockton, and G. A. Morgan, of Los Angeles, representing the defendant, called upon the plaintiff, Barmann, and had a conversation with him regarding the securing of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Modoc Land & Livestock Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Lassing v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Greenbaum v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Bill v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. California Canning Peach Growers v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Gopcevic v. California Packing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. TomasovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. MacRae v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API