Legal Opinion

Greenbaum v. Martinez

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1890No. 12678PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gibson, C.

Action against defendant Martinez as constable, and the sureties on his official bond, to recover, as damages, the sum of $262.84, the value of 160 sacks of wheat, alleged to have been wrongfully taken and converted by Martinez, as constable, under a writ of attachment issued in an action prosecuted in a court of a justice of the peace, and, also, the further sum of $100, alleged to have been expended for an attorney’s fee in the pursuit of the wheat. Trial was had before the court without a jury, and resulted in certain findings, — among others, that the wheat was taken as alleged,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Dashiell v. SlingerlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Bailey v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. McDonald v. McConkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Howard v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Becker v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hays v. WindsorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. MacRae v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Gianelli v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API