Legal Opinion
MacRae v. Heath
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 5, 1922No. Civ. No. 3857PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, J., pro tem.
On October 7, 1918, plaintiff as “seller” and defendant Heath "as “buyer” executed the following contract:
“For and in consideration of an advance payment of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00), receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the buyer buys and the seller sells the entire crop of citrus fruit, except lemons, on his several properties at Rialto, San Bernardino County, California, for three cents (3c) per pound for all varieties, delivered at a packing-house to be designated by the buyer, at Rialto, California, at such times and in such quantities as buyer may direct.
“It…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Pacific Grape Products Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- First National Bank v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.