Legal Opinion
United States v. Newman
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided January 31, 1983No. 41498; CM 440013PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
EVERETT, Chief Judge:
Appellant was tried at Mainz-Gonsenheim, Germany, by a general court-martial composed of officers. Charge I alleged that he conspired with Private First Class Kasimer W. Rutherford and Bettina Grupe to wrongfully use heroin, in violation of Article 81 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 881. According to Charge II, appellant, in conjunction with Rutherford and Grupe, violated a general regulation by wrongfully possessing a hypodermic syringe needle, contrary to Article 92 of the Code, 10 U.S.C. § 892. Charge III, which was predicated…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Julio C. Valle-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Gloria AuletCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Dan CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. VoorheesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. CorderoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. TrueCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.