Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 15, 1964No. 138PublishedCited by 1,466 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg

We have held today that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination must be deemed fully applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. Malloy v. Hogan, ante, p. 1. This case presents a related issue: whether one jurisdiction within our federal structure may compel a witness, whom it has immunized from prosecution under its laws, to give testimony which might then be used to convict him of a crime against another such jurisdiction.1

Petitioners were subpoenaed to testify at a hearing conducted by the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor concerning a work stoppage…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,466 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

1,461 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API