Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg
We have held today that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination must be deemed fully applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. Malloy v. Hogan, ante, p. 1. This case presents a related issue: whether one jurisdiction within our federal structure may compel a witness, whom it has immunized from prosecution under its laws, to give testimony which might then be used to convict him of a crime against another such jurisdiction.1
Petitioners were subpoenaed to testify at a hearing conducted by the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor concerning a work stoppage…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,466 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
1,461 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.