Legal Opinion

Javor v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1977No. Civ. 50018PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IBANEZ, J. *

This is a class action. George Javor, plaintiff-respondent, filed a complaint individually and on behalf of all consumer-purchasers who, between August 15, 1971, and December 11, 1971, purchased motor vehicles of certain models and descriptions and accessories thereto. Hereinafter all references to motor vehicles and accessories are to those referred to in the complaint.

The defendants named in the complaint are the State Board of Equalization of the State of California (Board); Hamilton Buick, Inc., a corporation, and all retailers of the motor vehicles. The only parties…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Gyerman v. United States Lines Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Javor v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Decorative Carpets, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Santa Barbara Optical Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Neecke v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Kuykendall v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Shapiro v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Ardon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API