Santa Barbara Optical Co. v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
The named plaintiffs, dispensing opticians, brought this class action for a refund of sales taxes paid to defendant by them and others “similarly situated” (unnamed plaintiffs). Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action in favor of the unnamed plaintiffs; the demurrer was sustained with leave to amend only as to them; they declined to amend and judgment of dismissal was entered pursuant to section 581, subdivision 3, Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment. 1
We accept as true the material allegations of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Collins v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Osborne v. Subaru of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Pledger v. BosnickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. DoughertyArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.