Legal Opinion

Santa Barbara Optical Co. v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1975No. Civ. 44370PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, J.

The named plaintiffs, dispensing opticians, brought this class action for a refund of sales taxes paid to defendant by them and others “similarly situated” (unnamed plaintiffs). Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action in favor of the unnamed plaintiffs; the demurrer was sustained with leave to amend only as to them; they declined to amend and judgment of dismissal was entered pursuant to section 581, subdivision 3, Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment. 1

We accept as true the material allegations of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Collins v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Osborne v. Subaru of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Pledger v. BosnickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Arizona Department of Revenue v. DoughertyArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API