Neecke v. City of Mill Valley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. Introduction
This appeal arises from a tax refund action brought by Joel Neecke (Neecke) against the City of Mill Valley (City) and other defendants. Neecke, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, challenged the City’s “municipal services tax,” which was levied on real property owners beginning in fiscal year 1985-1986 and continuing, on the ground that it violated state constitutional provisions adopted by the voters as part of Proposition 13.
The trial court held that the tax (1) in its forms prior to its 1989 amendments, violated section 1 of article XIII of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- IBM Personal Pension Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Mission Housing Development Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- In Re Cipro Cases I and IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.