Legal Opinion

Decorative Carpets, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1962No. L. A. No. 26026PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff a refund of sales taxes. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6933.) The facts were stipulated. Since April 1, 1955, plaintiff has sold carpeting at retail and has also furnished and installed carpeting. The tax with respect to sales of carpeting only was properly computed and paid. The tax with respect to sales and installations of carpeting, however, was overpaid. In each such transaction plaintiff collected a separately stated amount to cover the sales tax imposed upon it. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6052.)

Plaintiff computed the amount to cover the sales tax…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. County of San Bernardino v. Harsh California Corp.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. SlatteryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In Re WaltreusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API