Legal Opinion

In Re the Master Contract Between the Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict & United States

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1971No. File 10876PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIEGELMEIER, Judge.

The South Dakota Conservancy District, created by Ch. 453, § 5, S.L.1959 (now SDCL 46-17-4)1 whose boundaries are the boundaries of the State of South Dakota, is declared to be a governmental agency, body politic and corporate with authority to exercise the powers specified therein. Chapter 46-18 provides the method of establishing subdistricts. Oahe *447Conservancy Subdistrict claims to be duly established and organized thereunder. Chapters 46-17 and 46-18 of SDCL contain provisions outlining the powers and mode of operation of both districts. Proceedings were taken to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. Nebraska Mid-State Reclamation District v. Hall CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Knight v. GrimesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. La Mesa, Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Orr v. KneipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Farmers and Merchants State Bank v. MannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Kane v. KundertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Russillo v. ScarboroughDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API