Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 1

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1948No. 33764PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, Arche Donald Armstrong and Victoria L. Armstrong, to test the constitutionality of chapter 19, Title 19, S.L. 1947, p. 217, O.S. 1941, Cum. Supp. 1947, Title 19, chapter 20, providing for the organization and functioning of sewer improvement districts, in certain cases, and to test the validity of the proceedings under said law in connection with the organization of sewer improvement district No. 1, Tulsa county. From the record it appears that after the passage of the above act a petition praying for the creation of the sewer district was filed with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Hancock v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. WarramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Harbour Village Apartments v. City of MukilteoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Harbour Village Apts. v. City of MukilteoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Applications of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Board of Trustees of the West Highway Sanitary & Improvement District v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API