Doon v. Tesh
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
— After an examination of the record in this cause, and of the former decision rendered therein by Department Two, we are of opinion the judgment rendered is founded upon a correct exposition of the law applicable thereto.
Defendants had applied through the United States land-office for a patent to the Clark & Co. placer mine. Plaintiffs, who claim to own the Greenhorn Hydraulic placer mine, filed a protest and adverse claim in the land-office, claiming 24.30 acres, parcel of the land applied to be patented, and thereupon the register and receiver stayed proceedings in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Andres CastilleroSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Ferguson v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- United States v. ParrottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1858
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bogan v. Edinburgh American Land Mortg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- McFeters v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Donahue v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Anthony v. JillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Harris v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.