Anthony v. Jillson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
This was an action to determine the right to a patent to certain placer-mining ground. The defendants applied for a patent to a tract called the Rough Diamond mine. The plaintiffs claimed a tract of thirty acres, which overlapped a corner of the defendants’ claim to the extent of 7.44 acres. This latter piece is the one in controversy. An adverse claim was filed by the plaintiffs; and thereupon such proceedings were had that the present action was brought under section 2326 of the Revised Statutes to determine the validity of the respective claims. The trial court gave judgment for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Jackson v. RobySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Thompson v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Coveny v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Bogan v. Edinburgh American Land Mortg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Humphreys v. Idaho Gold Mines Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Cameron v. Ah QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Lavagnino v. UhligUtah Supreme Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.