Ferguson v. Neville
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order granting plaintiffs a new trial in the Superior Court of the County of Nevada. Caldwell, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Morrison, C. J.:
The statement on motion for a new trial in the above case presents the following state of facts: The plaintiffs on the trial introduced evidence showing that on the seventh day of December, 1876, the mining ground described in the complaint was a portion of the mineral land of the United States; that *357on that day Rose and Rehberg, who were both citizens of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years, located said ground as a mining claim in accordance with the local rules and customs of miners in that vicinity, and according to, and fully complying with, the provisions…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Doon v. TeshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Wilson v. Triumph Consolidated Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
- Suwa v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Gorman Mining Co. v. AlexanderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Tibbitts v. Ah TongMontana Supreme Court · 1883