Legal Opinion

United States v. Andres Castillero

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1863PublishedCited by 21 opinions

These were cross appeals, severally taken ■ by the United States, and by the claimants, from a decree of the District Court for the Northern District of California, in a claim of Andres Castillero, for land, under the Act of March 8, 1851. Before the commencement of the proceeding, the claim had been divided, and most of the shares in it were held by other persons, who, with Castillero, occupied the lands under the name of the New Almadén Mining Company.

Read the full summary

These were cross appeals, severally taken ■ by the United States, and by the claimants, from a decree of the District Court for the Northern District of California, in a claim of Andres Castillero, for land, under the Act of March 8, 1851. Before the commencement of the proceeding, the claim had been divided, and most of the shares in it were held by other persons, who, with Castillero, occupied the lands under the name of the New Almadén Mining Company. But the petition to the Board of Land Commissioners was presented by the attorneys of the company in the .name of Castillero alone, for his…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford

These are appeals from a decree of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, brought here under the Act of Congress of the 3d of March, 1851, entitled “ an Act to ascertain and settle the private land claims ” in that State.

*145Provision was made by the first section of that act for the appointment of Commissioners to examine all such claims, and decide upon their validity; and it was provided by the 8th section of the act, that every person claiming land in that State by virtue of any right or title derived from'.the Spanish or Mexican Governments, should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States vs. Knight’s Adm’rSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. United States v. CastilleroSupreme Court of the United States · 1860

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Botiller v. DominguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Covington v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Dabney v. HathawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Doon v. TeshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Kennedy v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API