Harris v. Kellogg
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Madera County granting a new trial. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover from the defendants the possession of a mining claim, and to restrain them from committing waste *487thereon. The cause was tried by the court, and findings were made sustaining the allegations of the complaint, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. Upon motion of the defendants a new trial was afterward granted, and from this order the plaintiffs have appealed.
In the statement upon motion for a new trial the only errors assigned are the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision, and the particular specifications of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Golden Fleece G. & S. M. Co. v. Cable Consolidated G. & S. M. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1877
- Quigley v. GillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tosco Corp. v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Ames v. Empire Star Mines Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Del Giorgio v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Jones v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Goldberg v. BruschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.