Legal Opinion

Strudthoff v. Yates

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1946No. L. A. 19270PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The two sons of John D. Strudthoff sued Sydney Yates, the administrator of the estate of their father, and his wife, Edith H. Yates, to impress a trust upon real property and for an accounting. Consolidated with this suit is a petition for revocation of letters of administration, the appointment of a successor administrator and a demand that Yates be ordered to render a more complete final account of his management of the estate. The principal charge of the heirs is that, pursuant to a fraudulent conspiracy and in violation of section 583 of the Probate Code, Yates transferred certain…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Baker v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Estate of Lucas v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Goldner v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Huth v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Oldis v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Taormino v. DennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API