Legal Opinion

Hysaw v. Dawkins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2016No. 14-0984PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman

Mineral deeds employing double fractions give rise to disputes about whether the instrument creates a fixed (“fractional”) royalty or a floating (“fraction off) royalty; The double-fraction problem emerges when an instrument expresses a royalty interest as the product of two fractions, such as “1/2 of the usual 1/8.” When viewed against a historical backdrop in which the standard royalty' was 1/8 and many landowners erroneously believed the landowner’s royalty could be no greater than 1/8, the quantum of the interest conveyed or reserved by double-fraction language is subject to disagreement.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Farm Life Insurance Co v. BeastonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Lightning Oil Co. v. Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Benedict G. Wenske and Elizabeth Wenske v. Steve Ealy and Deborah EalyTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Perryman v. Spart an Tex. Six Capital Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Apache Deepwater, LLC v. McDaniel Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. U.S. Shale Energy II, LLC, Raymond B. Roush, Ruthie Roush Dodge, and David E. Roush v. Laborde Properties, L.P., and Laborde Management, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2018

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API