Concord Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Exploration and Production Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1Judgment of the CourtOwen, Justice
in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, HECHT and ABBOTT, Justices, join.
The motions for rehearing were granted, and the opinion of the Court dated October 18,1996 is withdrawn.
This case presents an issue with which this Court, other courts, and practitioners have struggled for many years: What interest has been conveyed in an oil and gas property when two differing fractions appear within the conveying instrument? The granting clause of the mineral deed in controversy describes the interest conveyed as a 1/96 interest in minerals, but a subsequent clause *453states that the conveyance covers and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Woods v. SimsTexas Supreme Court · 1954
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. PoolTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- ConocoPhillips Co. v. KoopmannTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Stable Energy, L.P. v. Newberry, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Hysaw v. DawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Prize Energy Resources, L.P. v. Cliff Hoskins, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.