ConocoPhillips Co. v. Koopmann
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
In this case, we must determine whether the common law rule against perpetuities invalidates a grantee's future interest in the grantor's reserved non-participating royalty interest. We hold that it does not, but on grounds different from those expressed by the court of appeals. However, we hold that the reservation's savings clause is ambiguous and affirm the court of appeals' remand on this issue. In addition, we hold that section 91.402 of the Texas Natural Resources Code does not preclude a lessor's common law claim for breach of contract. Finally, we affirm the court of appeals' judgment…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- King v. Baylor UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Bates Energy Oil & Gas v. Complete Oilfield Servs.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
- In re Odebrecht Constr., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Raider Ranch, LP and Raider Ranch, GP, LLC v. Lugano, Ltd., A&L Sharif Family, LP, and Mamoush, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
- Amboree v. BontonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2019
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.