Legal Opinion

Sheffield v. Hogg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1934No. 6001; No. 6130PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

The above styled two cases will be determined under one opinion. In their consequences, the cases affect directly the subject matter of mineral royalties in Texas, which furnish an important basis for the State’s oil industry. Involving the correct solution of taxation of royalties on minerals — liquid, solid, and gaseous — they require the determination of the rights acquired by lessors and lessees under conveyances and contracts under which much of our minerals of untold value are owned and held. The questions presented by the two cases are logically too closely related for much that is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Ehlinger v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. Retamco Operating, Inc. v. Republic Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Thomas v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API