Legal Opinion

Back v. Farnsworth

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1938No. Civ. 6000PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Upon appropriate pleadings the trial court decreed that the appellants held a Los Angeles lot and dwelling house together with a sum of money collected as rental therefrom in trust for the respondent. It was held the facts involved establish a resulting trust in favor of the respondent. From that decree this appeal was perfected.

It is contended the findings and judgment are not supported by the evidence for the reason that the facts related by the respondent’s witnesses are inherently improbable; that the original trustee of the property held only a community interest with her husband in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Swanson v. SiemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Powell v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Thompson v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Holland v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Palmer v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gonzales v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API