Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

California Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1995No. S042933PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We granted review for the limited purpose of determining the acts necessary to sustain a conviction under Penal Code section 288.1 This statute imposes criminal liability on anyone who “willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or lascivious act” upon the body of a child under the age of 14 “with the intent of arousing ... the lust, passions, or sexual desires” of either party. (Id., subd. (a).)

For almost a century, section 288 has been interpreted to require no particular form of physical contact. The courts have established in a long unbroken line of cases that the crime occurs…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. United States v. Rafael Baron-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. People v. BenavidesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Richard Adams Hovey v. Robert L. Ayers, Jr., Acting Warden, California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API