Legal Opinion

Hjorth v. Bernstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1941No. Civ. 2643PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONWAY, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs commenced an action against defendants for rescission of a contract for the purchase of an oil royalty upon the ground of fraud, and in a second count of the complaint alleged a cause of action upon the common count of money had and received. No demurrers were filed and after issue was joined the case proceeded to trial. The court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment in favor of all of the defendants upon the cause of action based upon the theory of rescission of the contract, and gave plaintiffs judgment for $1553.71 against the defendant Sam Bernstein…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stuart v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Richardson v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Glover v. RadfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Karapetian v. CarolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Evans v. Rancho Royale Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API