Hjorth v. Bernstein
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CONWAY, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs commenced an action against defendants for rescission of a contract for the purchase of an oil royalty upon the ground of fraud, and in a second count of the complaint alleged a cause of action upon the common count of money had and received. No demurrers were filed and after issue was joined the case proceeded to trial. The court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment in favor of all of the defendants upon the cause of action based upon the theory of rescission of the contract, and gave plaintiffs judgment for $1553.71 against the defendant Sam Bernstein…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stuart v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Richardson v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Glover v. RadfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Karapetian v. CarolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Evans v. Rancho Royale Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.