Legal Opinion
Petersen v. Lyders
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 1934No. Civ. No. 9103PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSTON, J., pro tem.
This appeal is companion to the one taken by defendant in the above-entitled cause, which this day has been decided in favor of plaintiffs (ante, p. 303 [33 Pac. (2d) 1030]). The facts are fully set forth in the decision filed therein. As there stated, the defendant for many years has been the attorney for the consulate of Denmark. Plaintiffs were the heirs of different estates of decedents residing in the United States and in particular in California, in which matters connected with said estates defendant hád represented them as attorney upon request of the Danish…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Courteney v. Standard Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Engelberg v. SebastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- New York Cloak & Suit House v. CostonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. RauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Galbreath v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- Foley v. U. S. Paving Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Albertsworth v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.