Legal Opinion

New York Cloak & Suit House v. Coston

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1928No. Docket No. 3562PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The court found that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $600, with interest thereon, for money loaned to him by the plaintiff, and in the further sum of $1,498, and interest thereon, on account of moneys collected by him for the plaintiff and which he failed to deliver to the plaintiff. Judgment was entered accordingly and the defendant has appealed.

The evidence fully supports these findings and the appellant makes no contention to the contrary. The defendant was an employee of the plaintiff and, among other things, it was his duty to deliver merchandise to purchasers…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. G. R. Bott v. American Hydrocarbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Harlan v. OttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. G. R. Bott v. American Hydrocarbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API