Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Lyders

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1934No. Civ. No. 9094PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSTON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs, entered pursuant to a motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiffs sued the defendant on a common count for money had and received. Defendant was the attorney appointed by the Danish consul to represent plaintiffs in collecting certain moneys due from estates. Plaintiffs had executed a power of attorneys to the Danish Home Office in Denmark, which was forwarded to the Danish consul in San Francisco, who in turn appointed defendant and gave him the power of attorney. Defendant admitted this procedure and that at all times he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. National Bank v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Dean v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Feldman v. McGuireOregon Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Advance Industrial Finance Co. v. Western Equities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Brock v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. United States v. ClawsonDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API