Legal Opinion

Kentfield v. Reclamation Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1934No. Civ. No. 5060PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

On the tenth day of March, 1932, the appellants filed a petition in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, praying for a writ of mandate directing the Reclamation Board of the State of California to fix the amount of installments that should be called upon assessment No. 6, based upon an assessment levied upon the lands lying within the boundaries of the Sacramento and San Joaquin drainage district. Also, to fix the time at which such installments should be paid. The petition also prayed that the call for the payment of installments upon said assessment should be made in accordance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wiedwald v. DodsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. American Securities Co. v. ForwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alejo v. TorlaksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Elmore v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Crowley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Struhm v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. McCormack v. HoustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API