Legal Opinion

Struhm v. City Council

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1964No. Civ. 22248PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is an action in mandamus. Petitions signed by more than the required number of electors of the City of Berkeley were filed by the city clerk on August 3, 1964, calling for a special election to recall three named school directors. One of these resigned, but the other two have not. Opposing candidates have filed nomination papers, and the next general election will not be held until April 6, 1965. The city council contends that the recall provisions of the city charter are inoperable and refuses to call a special election. We have concluded that the council is legally obliged to do so.

We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Kentfield v. Reclamation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Schultz v. Board of Adjust. of Pottawattamie Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Russell v. Superior Court of Placer Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. State v. BerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API