Legal Opinion
McCormack v. Houston
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1948No. Civ. No. 7413PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Thomas McCormack and two others, constituting the Board of Trustees of Reclamation District No. 1000 (a public corporation), instituted this proceeding in behalf of the district, seeking a writ of mandate to compel Ray G. Houston, as County Treasurer and Ex-officio Trustee of the district, to transfer a portion of the moneys now in two certain designated Reserve Funds to the Bond Interest and Bond Principal Fund of said district.
The petition is submitted on a statement of the ease agreed to by counsel for the respective parties, and therefrom the following facts appear. From time to time,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Boskowitz v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Islais Co., Ltd. v. MathesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- River Farms Co. v. California GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fairbanks North Star Borough v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988