Legal Opinion
Target Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 21, 2010No. 2009-1518, 2009-1519PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This case comes to us on appeal from the Court of International Trade. At issue is whether the Court of International Trade correctly sustained the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final affirmative circumvention determination that petroleum wax candles with 50% or more vegetable wax (“mixed-wax candles”) are later-developed merchandise covered by the antidumping duty order on petroleum wax candles from China. Target Corp. v. United States, 626 F.Supp.2d 1285 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2009) (“Target II”). Because Commerce’s reasonable interpretation of the relevant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jinan Yipin Corp., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Deacero S.A. De C v. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Ceramark Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Deacero S.A. de C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Kyocera Solar, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.