Legal Opinion
Ceramark Technology, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 24, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-114; Court 13-00357PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Senior Judge:
In this action, Plaintiff, Ceramark Technology, Inc. (“Ceramark”) challenges the affirmative final determination of circumvention of an antidumping duty order. 1 Compl., ECF No. 9 at ¶ 2. In that determination, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) found that 17 inch diameter graphite electrodes (which Ceramark imports) constitute merchandise altered in form or appearance in such minor respects that it was properly subject to the anti-dumping duty order for graphite electrodes 16 inches or smaller in diameter. 2 Plaintiff claims that Commerce’s determination is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Agilent Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Mosaic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Agilent Techs. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.