Legal Opinion
Deacero S.A. De C v. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 5, 2016No. 2015-1362, 2015-1363, 2015-1367PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
Appellants appeal a judgment of the U.S. Court of International Trade (“Trade Court”) affirming the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) remand determination on certain small-diameter steel wire rod. Commerce initiated a minor alteration anti-circumvention inquiry and determined that certain small-diameter steéí wire rod was included within the scope of the subject anti-dumping duty order. On appeal, the Trade Court concluded that Commerce erred in its minor alterations analysis and remanded to Commerce. On remand, Commerce changed its determination and found under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Downhole Pipe & Equipment, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. v. United States, and Uss-Posco IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Bell Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Columbia Forest Prods. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Cooc v. Bureau Veritas North America Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.