Legal Opinion
Deacero S.A. de C v. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 30, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-126; Court 12-00345PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge:
Plaintiffs Deacero S.A. de C.V. and Deacero USA, Inc. (collectively, “Deacero”) contest the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or the “Department”) affirmative final determination of circumvention of the antidumping duty order on certain wire rod from Mexico. See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico, 77 Fed.Reg. 59,892 (Dep’t Commerce Oct. 1, 2012) (affirmative final determination of circumvention) (“Final Determination”). In that determination, Commerce found that wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 millimeter (“mm”) to 5.00 mm…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Timex V.I., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deacero S.A. De C v. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Ceramark Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Fabuwood Cabinetry Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Deacero S.A.P.I. de C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Deacero S.A.P.I. de C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.