Legal Opinion

Kyocera Solar, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 21, 2017No. Slip Op. 17-90; Court 15-00081PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Kelly, Judge:

Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) remand determination in the antidumping investigation of certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic products from Taiwan, filed pursuant to the court’s order in SunEdison, Inc. v. United States, 40 CIT -, 179 F.Supp.3d 1309 (2016). 2 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Oct. 5, 2016, ECF No. 75-1 3 (“Solar II Taiwan Remand Results”). For the reasons set forth below, the court sustains Commerce’s redetermi-nation because Commerce has complied with the court’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Xinjiamei Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  3. Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  5. Save Domestic Oil, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matra Americas, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
  2. SunPower Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  4. M S International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  5. M S International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API