Legal Opinion

Pestka v. County of Blue Earth

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 2002No. C3-02-566Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

This is the second appeal to this court arising from the petition for a drainage improvement to County Ditch # 86, Branch 1, in Blue Earth County. On appeal from summary judgment, appellants argue that the district court (a) erred in ruling that Minn.Stat. § 103E.5I1 (2002) gives the drainage authority the ability to approve a corrected report of the viewers; (b) should have ruled that Minn.Stat. §§ 103E.341 and 103E.505 (2002) preclude the drainage authority from awarding a contract for a drainage project unless it is known that the project’s benefits exceed its cost;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In Re Improvement of County Ditch No. 11, Martin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. In Re Improvement of Murray County Ditch No. 34Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Wold v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API