Legal Opinion
Bongard v. Bongard
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 28, 1983No. C4-83-1313PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This interlocutory appeal comes to the Court of Appeals from the trial court’s refusal to vacate a writ of attachment. Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 103.03(c). The writ was issued September 28, 1982. Mr. Bongard moved the trial court to vacate the writ. The trial court refused. After the trial court’s decision and after the time for appeal had expired, portions of the attachment statute were declared unconstitutional. Mr. Bongard again moved the trial court to vacate the writ. Again the trial court refused. We affirm.
FACTS
Marilyn Bongard claims that her ex-husband defrauded her in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- People Ex Rel. Farrington v. . MenschingNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- E.C.I. Corp. v. G.G.C. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marriage of Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. J. Reiter Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Copp v. RedmondWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re McKeagUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- In Re the Establishment of County Ditch No. 11 (Bevens Creek)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.