Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton
The questions here are the same as those in Roland Electrical Co. v. Walling, 326 U. S. 657. They are (1) whether respondent’s employees, under the facts of this case, are engaged “in the production of goods for commerce” within the meaning of §§ 6 and 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1060, 1062-1063, 29 U. S. C. §§ 206 and 207), and (2) whether, if so engaged, they nevertheless are exempted from the Act because they are engaged in a “retail or service establishment the greater part of whose selling or servicing is in intrastate commerce” within the meaning of § 13 (a) (2).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Symczyk v. Genesis HealthCare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.