Legal Opinion

Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1944No. 9755PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Notwithstanding some more or less remote approaches to the present problem in Kirschbaum v. Walling, 316 U.S. 517, 62 S.Ct. 1116, 86 L.Ed. 1638, and Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall, 317 U.S. 88, 63 S.Ct. 125, 87 L.Ed. 83, it is impossible for us to entertain the concept that window cleaning becomes interstate commerce, or is in pursuance of the production of goods for commerce, by the fact that the windows that are cleansed are in the manufacturing establishments of industries engaged in interstate commerce, nor are we able to reject the concept that a window cleaning company is a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Lonas v. National Linen Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Michigan Window Cleaning Co. v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  4. Walling v. Roland Electrical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Local 74, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, A. F. Of L.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API