Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Hartwell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 19, 1984No. 13137-1-IPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

Douglas Harold Hartwell appeals the restitution order entered after he pleaded guilty to leaving the scene of an accident. We find that the restitution ordered is not sufficiently related to the crime charged to satisfy the requirements of RCW 9.94A.140 and 9.95.210, and reverse the trial court order.

Hartwell was involved in an accident which caused serious injuries to three people. He left the scene of the accident without stopping to render aid or leave the information required by statute. Shortly afterward he was arrested at home and charged with violation of RCW 46.52.020, a felony.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. EiltsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. State v. BarrWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. LutmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Niichel v. LancasterWashington Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Matter of FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API