State v. Hennings
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
— The Defendants in these consolidated appeals challenge the validity of restitution orders which were entered more than 60 days after sentencing. Defendants argue that a statutory amendment retroactively expanding the time within which restitution orders may be entered either (a) does not apply to their cases, or (b) violates the ex post facto, bill of attainder, double jeopardy and due process provisions of the state and federal constitutions. We affirm the restitution orders entered by the trial courts.
Facts
Background Information. In July 1984, the Court of Appeals held that the following…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1998
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.