Legal Opinion

State v. Mark

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 11, 1984No. 11737-8-IPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

Albert Mark appeals from a restitution order entered after his 1977 jury conviction for grand larceny. We remand for the purpose of reducing the amount of required restitution from $230,000 to $93,000.

Mark, a West Seattle pharmacist, was convicted of grand larceny for submitting reimbursement claims to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) for medicines neither dispensed nor prescribed. He received a deferred sentence conditioned in part on payment of restitution to DSHS in an amount to be determined in a post-trial hearing. After various appeals, a restitution hearing was held…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. State v. EiltsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Seeley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API