State v. Mark
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.
Albert Mark appeals from a restitution order entered after his 1977 jury conviction for grand larceny. We remand for the purpose of reducing the amount of required restitution from $230,000 to $93,000.
Mark, a West Seattle pharmacist, was convicted of grand larceny for submitting reimbursement claims to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) for medicines neither dispensed nor prescribed. He received a deferred sentence conditioned in part on payment of restitution to DSHS in an amount to be determined in a post-trial hearing. After various appeals, a restitution hearing was held…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State v. EiltsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Seeley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.