Legal Opinion

State v. Eilts

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1980No. 46425PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*491Stafford, J.

Defendant Bobby Eilts appealed the terms of his probation order contending the court had exceeded its statutory authority to condition probation on restitution. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and remanded the cause for modification of the probation order. Restitution was limited to crimes for which defendant had been convicted. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

Defendant was charged with eight counts of securities fraud in violation of The Securities Act of Washington. RCW 21.20.010 and .400. Each count involved the sale of common stock in a nonoperating shell…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of CarleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Haddenham v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Burlington Northern, Inc. v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Automobile Drivers & Demonstrators Union Local No. 882 v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Diamond v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1991

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API